Mao Zedong had a famous saying: "afraid afraid of the world to two words, the Communist Party is most seriously." But in dealing with the Constitution's attitude, China as America seriously. America is a very serious country, Americans are very serious people, as long as the constitutional right of citizens, it must be, not vague.

    The obscene goods issue is this: in the American, there were intense debate for decades to ban obscene goods in question. Advocate the obscene pornography a most famous character is American feminist Mackinnon (Catherine Mackinnon) and Dworkin (Andrea Dworkin. The main reason why they oppose bawdy pornography is pornography, obscenity, the main theme is the domination of men over women. Dworkin proposed a win universal praise slogan: obscene goods is theoretical, rape is a practice. She thinks, obscene ideas, obscene goods is action. Obscene goods effectively became the object of women to become prostitutes, male use.

   Manufacture and sale of obscene pornography have the violation of women's rights? Whether should be the sanctions? Or it can be a way of allowing freedom of expression? Mackinnon and Dworkin insisted that obscene goods, advocating censorship, their two people draft laws, to take civil action against its, this proposal was "moral majority" (Moral Majority) and ultra conservative group support. In 1983, the anti pornographic Products Act was drafted by Mackinnon, Dworkin, Ming Neenah wave obtained by the council. Anti pornography law through depends mainly on the religious right support. In 1984, this method was used for the Indianapolis USA Booksellers Association and the harder the lawsuit, the defendant was charged with selling obscene goods crime, the plaintiff. In 1986, American Supreme Court ruled this law is unconstitutional, because it violates the first amendment to the constitution of USA free speech clause. The Supreme Court ruled, obscene goods is not speech, action, protect it by constitution on freedom of speech in terms of.

   American is a constitutional court state, to protect the constitutional rights of citizens, protect the citizens will not be unconstitutional and constitutional law violation. I suggest China also established the constitutional court, for the same reason. If we have the constitutional court, the significance lies not only in the creation of pornographic novels published on the Internet are not jailed, more is those who be convicted for speech not, never die. If we have a constitutional court, Lin Zhao would not have died, Zhang Zhixin would not have died, Yu will not die, Gu will never die, Deng Tuo would not have died, Wu Han would not have died, Liu Shaoji will never die. Will not have the anti rightist movement of hundreds of thousands of right, will not have the cultural revolution.

   "Afraid afraid of the world to two words", Americans are quite serious about their constitution, we Communists in our constitution should be better than they have seriously, because "the Communist Party is the most speak seriously".