A lawyer by Japanese rape

-- a "Walker" you ask

He Weifang

Note: This article was published, (in my another blog on sina net also please do not have to be so nervous, often hidden to the so-called "private blog".Http://heweifang.fyfz.cn/blog/heweifang/index.aspx? Blogid=566886)

A lawyer Li Zhuang case, I reproduced the lawyer Chen Youxi part of defense in court in Bo Lao Ge li. In my comments and January 1 wrote editorials for the trial of new year's day, expressed concern and not optimistic expectations.4Day, a signed "Skywalker" netizens to post way wrote me a letter, as follows:

Lines given by

He teacher, happy new year.

I'm on the legal construction of our country and the court system reform views on you a deep sympathy, but to you about the new / / Xinjiang views (although you did not clear) and lawyer Li Zhuang views dare not flatter.

First, no matter for any reason splitting / Xinjiang is wrong, for you sir, I want to be without any explanation, this point state will not change this basic principle of any system, change who I think most Chinese will not agree. Since the party's governance in some places has not done enough, but it is precisely in the minority policy should be said to be very good, keep their religion, education, fertility and many other aspects all enjoy higher than Han privileges, the conflict between the Han Minority, local officials fear back undermine national unity charges, usually focus on the Han nationality personnel, I read the school, work area this kind of thing happened. Economic and other ethnic minority areas less developed can be said that basically all is because of remoteness, but can say many Han than their poorer, this can not be blamed on the national policy. New / / dynamic / / Xinjiang occurred after the chaos, in order to prevent the Separatists, escalation, network management of a certain period of time I think we should be, Mr. He at this point the blame I think not agree.

A lawyer Li Zhuang. Anyway, the lawyer can teach or give the defendant to the facts and law as the basis for defense, but induced or abetting the defendant violated the fact not symbol of sophistry is wrong; to inform the accused a partner at large to imply some guilt can evasiveness or lack of evidence may be pleaded not guilty, these are also against the law responsibility and ethics in violation of the relevant provisions of the criminal law, shall be investigated for criminal responsibility is not wrong, his.

China's law construction development, this point I agree he teacher's opinion, but Li Zhuang this healthy development of lawyer can only destroy the lawyer groups. I have been very worship, but for a period of time to see in these two attitudes, feel some wrong, speak out, please understanding.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

First of all, I thank you very much. The well intentioned criticism. Recently, here can often see some friends too emotional expression, although I understand the anger for the corrupt, bully, reality is indeed some lawyers there is misconduct or bribe the judge question, however, take the matter on its merits, the lawyer Li Zhuang case, we still need to make comments in a rational manner. Walker you show here is a frank attitude and rational, I also would like to specially make a response, to teach in Walker and friends.

Walker was first mentioned Sinkiang problem. I don't agree with you for the evaluation of the current national policy, however, this problem is not suitable for discussion here at this time (Bo Lao Ge editorial cannot publish is an example here), please allow me to talk about the Li Zhuang case.

He said, if the lawyer induced or abetting accused sophistry is of course an inappropriate behavior, however, this is only done by prosecutors accused. Li Zhuang what with the defendant was how to exchange, seems a muddled account. Needs to be pointed out is, as a lawyer, in meet the defendant asked whether torture to extract confessions facts, and requirements in the presence of the facts of a case in court clearly, nothing's wrong, and even can be said that this is a lawyer's duty. In this trial, as Mr Gong Gangmo himself is the prosecution allegations Li Zhuang lawyer, then he is a key witness. Li Zhuang and his lawyers have the right to request the court in Gong Gangmo, to ascertain the facts. But, curiously, Gong as well as related to the other seven witnesses in the case but does not testify in court, lawyers request was the court refused. So, the judge how to for such charges to judge? If Gong Gangmo is because of stress or intention against lawyers in exchange for a lighter punishment, the court where discrimination? At a seminar held on the case, I expressed this view: major problem relates to one crime and non crime, witnesses to court in Criminal Procedure Law of our country, otherwise provided for in the testimony of witness testimony must be in before they can accept as court rules will become a mere scrap of paper. To tell the truth, the court refused to witness (especially in witness appearing in court for Li Zhuang) practices that the accused is shameful, some people are afraid to confront Li Zhuang and Gong Gangmo face to face. Can say, the court -- even procuratorate -- in this case no independence, but is a marionette.

Frankly, I don't know anything about the lawyer Li Zhuang, for his agent Gong Gangmo case behavior also know nothing at all. I am just procedure itself questioned. Walker said, "the healthy development of" Li Zhuang's lawyer will only destroy the lawyer group, I do not know you for the lawyer how to understand? If you just make a judgment based on the prosecution or media reports and allegations, if premature?

I also want to say a few words on the recent Chongqing with vigour and vitality of the so-called "black". In a society ruled by law, the court, the procuratorate and the Public Security Bureau were mobilized in the so-called "black", which itself is a kind of unbelievable behavior, it can be said that tramples the law behavior. If the Public Security Bureau, can also carry out centralized criminal behavior for a particularly prominent, and the relevant materials to the procuratorial organs and request the prosecution charges as soon as possible, in order to maintain social order. However, as the judicial organ of the procuratorate and the court must adhere to the rational position, particularly the court, must be strictly according to the law for each case to make a fair decision. Only this kind of reason and justice to guarantee every citizen's freedom and social long period of stability. On the contrary, law enforcement and judicial that movement is enough to bring tremendous and far-reaching harm to human rights and social order. Frankly, when television reported arrangement were a huge array of trial in court, the lawyers are required to "serve", so the so-called "black" is not "black". In the rule of law shouted the slogan has been more than thirty years today, the cultural revolution movement -- with the praise of the cultural revolution of the so-called "red songs" -- once again stage a comeback, what purpose is in doubt.

Sadly, some netizens as if possessed, as long as I heard "black" thought to his own advantage; see lawyers were suppressed was as cheerful as a lark. In fact, human history, in the suspect or the people we doesn't like the rights not to protect the rights of the people of the place, it is all gone. A lawyer by day, when people suffer.1957Years almost The whole army was wiped out. lawyer, but the attendant is the jungle, the whole nation is worried. The court's judges and prosecutors, not the police?